Missouri / Senate
How did Missouri vote for the Senate?
2024 · data family: electiondata.dev
Josh Hawley (Republican) won by 13.7 points
13.7ptsSenate, 2024: winner's margin
- Josh Hawley (Republican) 55.6%, Lucas Kunce (Democrat) 41.8%, W. C. Young (Libertarian) 1.2%
- 2,972,559 votes for Senate candidates
Compare every state: where Missouri ranks for 2024
- Democrat ahead
- Republican ahead
Show the numbers (17 rows)
| Year | Margin |
|---|---|
| 2024 | R +13.7 |
| 2022 | R +13.7 |
| 2018 | R +5.8 |
| 2016 | R +2.8 |
| 2012 | D +15.7 |
| 2010 | R +13.6 |
| 2006 | D +2.3 |
| 2004 | R +13.3 |
| 2000 | D +2.1 |
| 1998 | R +8.9 |
| 1994 | R +24.0 |
| 1992 | R +7.0 |
| 1988 | R +36.0 |
| 1986 | R +5.3 |
| 1982 | R +1.7 |
| 1980 | D +4.3 |
| 1976 | R +14.4 |
Every Senate race since 1976
| Race | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Josh Hawley (R) 55.6% | Lucas Kunce (D) 41.8% | 13.7 pts | 2,972,559 |
| 2022 | Eric Schmitt (R) 56.8% | Trudy Busch Valentine (D) 43.2% | 13.7 pts | 2,012,511 |
| 2018 | Josh Hawley (R) 51.4% | Claire Mccaskill (D) 45.6% | 5.8 pts | 2,442,289 |
| 2016 | Roy Blunt (R) 49.2% | Jason Kander (D) 46.4% | 2.8 pts | 2,802,637 |
| 2012 | Claire Mccaskill (D) 54.8% | W. Todd Akin (R) 39.1% | 15.7 pts | 2,725,793 |
| 2010 | Roy Blunt (R) 54.2% | Robin Carnahan (D) 40.6% | 13.6 pts | 1,943,899 |
| 2006 | Claire Mccaskill (D) 49.6% | James M. Talent (R) 47.3% | 2.3 pts | 2,128,459 |
| 2004 | Christopher S. Bond (R) 56.1% | Nancy Farmer (D) 42.8% | 13.3 pts | 2,706,402 |
| 2002 special | Jim Talent (R) 49.8% | Jean Carnahan (D) 48.7% | 1.1 pts | 1,877,620 |
| 2000 | Mel Carnahan (D) 50.5% | John Ashcroft (R) 48.4% | 2.1 pts | 2,361,586 |
| 1998 | Christopher S. Bond (R) 52.7% | Jeremiah W. (jay) Nixon (D) 43.8% | 8.9 pts | 1,576,857 |
| 1994 | John Ashcroft (R) 59.7% | Alan Wheat (D) 35.7% | 24.0 pts | 1,775,116 |
| 1992 | Christopher S. Bond (R) 51.9% | Geri Rothman-serot (D) 44.9% | 7.0 pts | 2,354,916 |
| 1988 | John C. Danforth (R) 67.7% | Jeremiah W. (jay) Nixon (D) 31.8% | 36.0 pts | 2,078,875 |
| 1986 | Christopher (kit) Bond (R) 52.6% | Harriett Woods (D) 47.4% | 5.3 pts | 1,477,327 |
| 1982 | John C. Danforth (R) 50.9% | Harriett Woods (D) 49.1% | 1.7 pts | 1,543,521 |
| 1980 | Thomas F. Eagleton (D) 52.0% | Gene Mcnary (R) 47.7% | 4.3 pts | 2,066,965 |
| 1976 | John C. Danforth (R) 56.9% | Warren E. Hearnes (D) 42.5% | 14.4 pts | 1,914,460 |
Get this data
This page's numbers, as JSON:
curl https://visualizedata.org/data/places/us-mo/senate.jsonEvery Senate race, every state, from electiondata.dev (live, no key):
curl "https://api.electiondata.dev/v1/senate-results/download/senate-results.csv"What this can't tell you
- Statewide totals say nothing about who voted or why.
- Candidates with a party's support under another name (Minnesota's DFL, New York's fusion lines) are counted with that party, as the MIT data's simplified party does; independents stay independents.
How the answer is decided
Each candidate's votes are summed over every ballot line; blank, over- and under-votes are left out. The margin is the winner's share of the votes minus the runner-up's. A runoff, where held, is the result.